HISTORY OF LAND TENURE IN IRELAND

The Brehon Laws

1 The Brehon Laws 2 Remedies under the Brehon Laws 3 Royal Succession under the Brehon Laws
4 The Tánaiste 5 The Brehon Marriage Laws Return to Killeens Home Page
Your Comments Please

The Brehon Laws

A king did not have absolute power, but was, like everybody else, subject to the law, (to some extent, at least).

Each king had an official judge called a "brithem" (pronounce "brehev", anglicised as "Brehon", i.e., judge or jurist), to adjudicate, or assist in adjudicating, on legal matters within his jurisdiction, and to represent him in legal matters with other Tuatha. Another class of lawyer was the Aigne, (pronounce Eye-na), or advocate. The laws were common over the whole island, and conferences of the brehons were frequently held for the purpose of updating the laws and ironing out any differences that might arise. Such conferences were largely independent of influence from the kings, and were pan-national, even when nobody held sway as high king. In fact, the Brehon laws contain little or no reference to the position of High King, the reality being that power was concentrated at regional or provincial level.

While legend has it that there were 5 provinces, provincial or regional boundaries fluctuated as power groupings changed. (In modern Ireland there are 4 provinces, but these do not have separate governments or administrations; one province, Ulster, is divided, 3 of its counties being in the Republic of Ireland, and 6 counties being part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The administrative units are the counties,- of which there are 26 in the Republic and 6 in Northern Ireland,- and regional groupings of counties for various purposes, e.g., Eastern Health Board, Western Health Board, etc., which do not correspond to Provincial boundaries).

Top of Page

Remedies under the Brehon Laws

The universal remedy for wrong done by one person to another was the payment of compensation. The compensation was based on the Honour Price of the victim or the victim's kin and the nature and seriousness of the wrong. If you were not able to pay the due compensation, then the debt could be levied against your kinsmen, (with resulting obligations by you to your kinsmen). If the due compensation was not paid in respect of a serious wrong, the culprit could be killed or taken into bondage. Culprits evading their obligations could become outlaws, losing their human rights. (However, an outlaw could regain his rights by atoning for the wrong by paying the due compensation). Evasions of their obligations by kings could give rise to other kings combining together to wage war on and punish the culprit. To avoid the loss of face associated with being involved in proceedings, a commoner was often appointed as the king's representative in proceedings, i.e., a person who would be sued in place of the king.

There were apparently no prisons in ancient Ireland, although there is reference to perpetrators being held in chains and hostage-taking was a common practice to enforce political loyalty.

Top of Page

Royal Succession under the Brehon Laws

Primo geniture did not apply under the Brehon Laws. When a king died, he was succeeded by the most suitable candidate, who was required to be of sound mind and body. In Pagan times, the successor was chosen by magic rites, controlled by the druids, whereas in Christian times it became the custom for the close kinship group, called the derfine, (pronounce der-finna), of the dead king to elect the new king. The derfine comprised persons descended from the one great- grandfather on the paternal side. Politics played its part in the election, since each election of a king was accompanied by a redefinition of the derfine, with the consequent exclusion of some existing members.

Top of Page

The Tánaiste

The tradition of electing a new king after the death of the old king worked well in peaceful times. However, in the centuries of strife introduced by the Normans, a clan would be at a great military disadvantage to be without a king at that vital time. The custom, therefore, grew up of the king appointing his own successor during his lifetime. This heir-apparent was known as the Tánaiste (pronounce Taw-nish-tah), a term revived in the Irish Constitution of 1937 to depict the member of government who takes over the role of Taoiseach (pronounce "Thee-shock"), or Prime Minister, in the event of his death while in office.

Top of Page

The Brehon Marriage Laws

The Brehon marriage laws were quite different to the laws we now have in Ireland, although, with the removal of the concept of illegitimacy and the introduction of divorce in recent decades, we are moving back in that direction.

Marriage could be by contract, but, also, any sexual union which produced offspring was considered a marriage.

All marriages involved duties of one spouse to the other as well as obligations in relation to one's children. A person could, under this system, have multiple marriages.

Husband and wife held separate property, unlike the English law which gave a wife's property over to her husband. The spouse moving into the other's territory took his/her cattle with him/her. A husband usually paid a Coibhce (pronounce Kivka) or bride-price to the bride's father, and, over a period of years, to the bride. If the marriage was not successful, that spouse went back to his/her own people, taking with him/her the cattle brought in and their increase. In addition, a payment of compensation might arise between the spouses, depending on the nature of the contract of marriage and the circumstances of the split-up. If the break-up was the wife's fault, the bride-price was returned to the husband; but not if it was the husband's.

Marriage of propertied people was often for 20 years initially, with a renewal if the parties so agreed. The marriage itself was often preceded by a trial marriage.

These laws continued into the Christian period and were apparently supported by St Columba at the conference of Drom Ceat, (pronounce Drumm Kyat), (575 A.D.).

(The Norman and English invaders, by contrast, attempted to impose moral law. They enforced monogamous marriage, and disenfranchised "illegitimate" children. In their enthusiasm for punishing crime, the idea of compensating the victims became of lesser importance. Imprisonment replaced bondage).

Top of Page

Stone Age to Iron Age Celtic Ireland The Brehon Laws
Christianity and the Brehon Laws"Brehon-law Land TenureNorse and Normans
English Land Law in IrelandThe Land War and Reforms Land Regulation
Sources Return to Killeens Home Page
Your Comments Please
Top of Page